646 666 9601 [email protected]

A domain trademark dispute is a legal disagreement that emerges when two firms attempt to utilise the same domain name.

 Domain Trademark Disputes

A domain trademark dispute is a legal disagreement that emerges when two firms attempt to utilise the same domain name. Domain names and trademarks are examples of intellectual property that may be enforced via legal action. Domain names may be the subject of two sorts of disputes:


Possession (regarding security interests).

What Exactly Is Cybersquatting?

Cybersquatting is a kind of trademark law that focuses on the use of an infringing domain name. Using another person’s or entity’s domain name is not permitted on its own, but cybersquatting takes the matter to a new level by including a protected trademark into a domain name. This implies that the aggrieved party may sue both for trademark infringement and under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.

If the claim is successful, the aggrieved party may recover monetary damages as well as transfer ownership of the infringing domain name to the trademark holder.

If you’re pursuing legal action against another party over the use of a domain name but just want to win control of the domain, you may utilise the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP). This is an arbitration case, not a full-fledged trial. This style of procedure is well-known over the world and has been in use for a long time.

A new policy known as Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) is set to go into effect shortly, and it is intended to provide a low-cost and quick manner of resolving infringement claims. This policy will be most effective in cases when there is a clear example of violation.

All cybersquatting cases confront the same challenge: proving the accused cybersquatter’s bad faith intentions. Trademark infringement is often simpler to prove. In UDRP and URS cases, the trademark in dispute must be registered. This is an excellent reminder to make sure your trademarks are registered.

Disputes about the legitimate owner of a domain name often focus on two basic characteristics of ownership. The first step is to possess a trademark, followed by domain-name ownership and registration. Because registered domain names are new to the scene, they provide a fresh challenge to courts in terms of intellectual property rights.

What Exactly Are Trademarks?

Trademarks are a sort of intellectual property that, if registered, may be legally protected. They are often expressed as phrases, words, logos, or other forms of creative expression. Domain names may occasionally infringe on trademarks since the domain name registrar will just provide ownership of a domain name to the first person who wants it without checking for any trademarks.

This implies that by registering a domain name without first verifying the USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) database, a person or business organisation may inadvertently infringe on a registered trademark or trade name. To minimise misunderstanding, trademarks may sometimes be the same or similar terms as long as the companies or commodities they represent are significantly distinct. For example, an airline and a water faucet manufacturer both have the word “Delta” registered as a trademark. When two related industries attempt to utilise the same brand, problems are more likely to develop.

Is it possible for two parties to register the same domain name?

The simple answer is that two parties cannot register the same domain name at the same time. In certain circumstances, rivals may register domain names only for the purpose of holding them and selling them for a profit in a bidding war. This is known as cybersquatting, and the third parties who engage in it are known as pirates. Even if two firms that have been using their trademarks properly for years both wish to register a domain name for their company, they cannot use the same domain name.

In the instance of the Delta trademark, only one of the firms with the same name may own the domain name. This implies that only one of the firms may possess delta.com, while the other must purchase a.org domain or alter the name slightly in order to get a.com name. The issue of domain names raises a number of possible issues since the domain name is typically a truncated or slightly modified form of the protected name, word, or phrase.