[email protected]
  • Securities Law
  • Incorporations
  • Managed Legal
  • Capital Markets
Generis Global Legal Services
  • Services
    • Structured Finance
    • M&A
    • Electronic Discovery
    • Document Review
    • Legal Research
    • Funding
    • Incorporation
    • Consulting
    • Managed Legal Services & LPO
    • Agreements
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Partner Program
  • Knowledge Base
  • Tools
    • Business Cost Calculator
    • Patent Cost Calculator
    • Trademark Cost Calculator
    • Settlement Letter Generator
    • Employee Contract Maker
    • Divorce Petition Drafter
    • Lease Agreement Generator
    • Discovery Request Builder
    • Will Creator
    • NDA Maker
    • Dissolution Fee Calculator
    • Bylaws Drafter
    • UCC Filing Fee Estimator
    • Franchise Fee Calculator
    • IP Assignment Tool
    • Merger Fee Estimator
    • Stock Grant Tool
    • Business License Lister
Select Page

Understanding New Hampshire’s Child Support Model: Income Shares vs. Percentage-of-Income

Aug 19, 2025

Table of Contents

  • Introduction to Child Support Models
  • What is the Income Shares Model?
  • What is the Percentage-of-Income Model?
  • New Hampshire’s Child Support Guidelines
  • Comparison of Income Shares and Percentage-of-Income in New Hampshire
  • Advantages of New Hampshire’s Chosen Model
  • Challenges and Critiques of the Current Model
  • Recent Developments and Future Directions
  • Conclusion
    • Smart Legal Starts Here
    • Smart Legal Starts Here
    • Related Posts

Introduction to Child Support Models

Child support is a critical aspect of family law, ensuring that children receive the financial assistance they need to thrive following a separation or divorce. Two primary models govern child support calculations: the income shares model and the percentage-of-income model. Each of these frameworks has its unique features and implications for both custodial and non-custodial parents, shaping how financial responsibility for children is determined and enforced.

The income shares model is based on the principle that children should receive the same proportion of parental income as they would have if the parents had maintained a united household. This approach considers the combined income of both parents, factoring in a shared responsibility for the child’s needs. By using this model, child support calculations aim to reflect the living standards the child would have enjoyed, promoting fairness in financial obligations. Proponents argue that this model is beneficial because it provides a more equitable outcome for families, taking into account the socio-economic realities of both parents.

In contrast, the percentage-of-income model simplifies the calculation process by applying a fixed percentage of the non-custodial parent’s income to determine support obligations. This model is often seen as easier to administer, as it provides clarity regarding support payments based solely on income levels. While this method may lack the nuance of the income shares model, it streamlines the process for many families, presenting a straightforward expectation of financial responsibilities. Critics of this approach contend that it may not adequately account for the complexities of individual family dynamics.

Both models serve the essential function of ensuring the welfare of children during and after parental separations. Understanding the differences and implications of these models is crucial as we delve into New Hampshire’s unique child support framework and how it incorporates elements from these various approaches to address the needs of families in the state.

What is the Income Shares Model?

The Income Shares Model is a method used to determine child support obligations by taking into account the combined income of both parents. This model operates on the premise that children should receive the same amount of financial support, regardless of their parents’ living arrangements. It seeks to replicate the financial circumstances the child would have experienced had the parents stayed together, thereby promoting a sense of shared parental responsibility.

Under this model, the child support amount is calculated based on several factors, notably the income levels of both parents and the number of children involved. To facilitate this process, various guidelines are established that provide a formula for determining the appropriate support amount. These guidelines reflect average expenditures on children, which can encompass essentials such as food, clothing, education, and medical care.

A significant feature of the Income Shares Model is its focus on both parents’ contributions. By considering the combined income, it encourages cooperative financial planning and participation from both parents in meeting their children’s needs. This approach not only prioritizes the child’s financial wellbeing but also fosters a collaborative relationship between parents, as they often must voluntarily share information regarding their incomes and expenses.

Furthermore, the model emphasizes the notion of shared parental responsibility, which reinforces the idea that both parents play a role in the financial upbringing of their children, irrespective of their marital status. This shared accountability can lead to more equitable and fair child support allocations, ultimately benefiting the child’s overall welfare. Thus, the Income Shares Model stands as a formidable framework for modern child support calculations, promoting fairness and responsibility among parents.

What is the Percentage-of-Income Model?

The percentage-of-income model is a child support calculation method widely utilized in various jurisdictions, including New Hampshire. Under this model, the amount of financial support a non-custodial parent is required to contribute is determined as a fixed percentage of that parent’s gross income. This approach aims to establish a straightforward and predictable framework for calculating child support obligations, making it relatively easy for both parents to understand their financial responsibilities.

One significant advantage of the percentage-of-income model is its simplicity. By employing a straightforward formula based on income percentages, both parents can quickly assess the amount owed in child support. This predictability helps in budgeting for both the custodial and non-custodial parents. Additionally, as income fluctuates—whether due to raises, job changes, or earnings variations—the child support obligation adjusts accordingly, thus safeguarding the financial interests of the child against changes in parental income.

However, despite its merits, this model is not without its disadvantages. The fixed percentage approach can sometimes inadequately address unique circumstances of specific cases. For instance, it may fail to consider extraordinary expenses related to a child’s education, healthcare, or other special needs. Consequently, this can lead to disparities in child support payments when actual costs exceed what the simple percentage can accommodate. Furthermore, relying solely on income percentages may overlook the financial ability of a parent when their income fluctuates significantly, leading to potential inadequacies in support.

In summary, while the percentage-of-income model provides a clear and predictable method for determining child support, it also presents challenges that necessitate a careful examination of each family’s specific financial situation to ensure fair and adequate support for children’s needs.

New Hampshire’s Child Support Guidelines

In New Hampshire, the child support model utilized is the income shares model, which is designed to estimate the amount of financial support that children would receive if their parents lived together. This model considers the combined income of both parents and aims to mirror the expected financial contributions that would occur in a two-parent household. Under this approach, both parents are expected to contribute to their child’s financial needs in proportion to their individual incomes.

The income shares model takes into account various factors such as the number of children, the parents’ respective incomes, and the costs of housing, healthcare, education, and other child-related expenses. By assessing these elements, New Hampshire’s guidelines help ensure that child support payments are fair and equitable, reflecting the parents’ financial capabilities while prioritizing the child’s welfare. The state employs a specific formula to calculate the child support amount, which is adjusted periodically to account for changing economic conditions and the needs of children.

In addition, New Hampshire has established a comprehensive set of guidelines to inform parents about their responsibilities and rights concerning child support. These guidelines provide clarity on how income is defined, what expenses are included in the calculation, and the procedure for modifications if a parent’s financial situation changes significantly. Furthermore, New Hampshire emphasizes the importance of cooperation between parents, encouraging them to work collaboratively to reach agreements that best serve their children’s interests.

Understanding these guidelines is crucial for divorced or separated parents navigating their child support obligations. With the income shares model in place, parents can anticipate a more predictable and transparent assessment of support payments, which ultimately contributes to the stability and well-being of their children.

Comparison of Income Shares and Percentage-of-Income in New Hampshire

In New Hampshire, child support is determined primarily through two models: the Income Shares model and the Percentage-of-Income model. Each of these approaches carries distinct implications for both parents and children, influencing financial obligations, parental involvement, and the overall fairness of the support system. Understanding these differences is crucial for residents navigating child support agreements.

The Income Shares model is designed to estimate the amount both parents would have spent on their child if they had remained together. In this framework, the combined income of both parents is evaluated, and a specific support amount is derived from that total. This model promotes parental involvement, as it emphasizes the shared financial responsibility of child rearing, which can lead to a more equitable distribution of costs. The implication is that higher combined incomes may reflect a stronger obligation to provide for children’s needs, consequently leading to potentially higher support payments.

Conversely, the Percentage-of-Income model focuses primarily on the non-custodial parent’s income. This formula outlines that a specific percentage of the non-custodial parent’s income is allocated for child support, typically without direct consideration of the other parent’s income. While this method streamlines calculations and can be beneficial in straightforward cases, it may also result in inconsistencies when determining fairness, particularly in situations where the custodial parent earns significantly more. Additionally, the direct link between income and payments can lead to fluctuations based on periodic changes in the payer’s earnings, which can create uncertainty in financial planning.

Ultimately, the choice between using the Income Shares model or the Percentage-of-Income model affects not only financial obligations but also the dynamics of parenting after separation. Understanding these differences is essential for parents in New Hampshire to ensure that child support arrangements are just and supportive of their children’s best interests.

Advantages of New Hampshire’s Chosen Model

New Hampshire has adopted the Income Shares model for calculating child support, which incorporates various advantages that benefit families and children alike. This model emphasizes the principle of shared parental responsibility, ensuring that support obligations are not solely placed on one parent. By considering both parents’ incomes, the model promotes a more equitable approach to child support, allowing for a more balanced distribution of financial responsibilities.

One of the primary advantages of the Income Shares model is its reflection of the actual living expenses that children would have experienced had their parents remained together. This approach fosters a sense of fairness, as it recognizes that both parents have a financial role in the upbringing of their children. By taking into account the combined income of both parents, the model creates a Child Support Obligation that correlates to the family’s financial status. This ensures that children receive adequate support that aligns with the resources available to the family.

Additionally, the model helps reduce conflicts between parents regarding financial obligations. By offering a clear and standardized way of calculating support payments, the Income Shares model minimizes disagreements and misunderstandings. When parents are more informed about how support amounts are determined, they may be more likely to cooperate and engage in constructive communication about their children’s needs.

Furthermore, the model promotes stability for the children, as consistent financial support helps ensure their basic needs are met. Stability is crucial in a child’s life, and a predictable child support structure can lead to improved emotional and psychological well-being. Through the Income Shares model, New Hampshire seeks to foster an environment where children can thrive, regardless of their parents’ marital status.

Challenges and Critiques of the Current Model

New Hampshire’s child support model, encompassing both the income shares and percentage-of-income approaches, has sparked substantial debate among parents and legal experts alike. One notable challenge is the perceived inability of these models to fully address the unique financial circumstances of each family. For many parents, the rigid structures of the current system may not comprehensively reflect their actual expenses or income variations. This is particularly true in households with fluctuating incomes, such as those reliant on commission-based salaries or seasonal employment, where consistent support payments can pose significant difficulties.

Additionally, some parents argue that the income shares model may unintentionally disadvantage them by creating an illusion of equitable support distribution. Critics suggest that the formula does not account for other obligations a parent may be managing, such as child care expenses, medical bills, or the cost of living in different regions of New Hampshire. As a result, non-custodial parents may find themselves struggling to meet expectations established by the calculated support obligation, leading to potential financial strain and a disconnection from their children’s needs.

The percentage-of-income method, while simpler to understand and implement, also faces scrutiny. It can lead to issues of fairness, primarily because it may not consider the custodial parent’s needs beyond basic living expenses. Critics express concern that, as a result, the current model could perpetuate disparities, leaving many families in precarious financial situations. These challenges highlight the necessity for reform, which might include a thorough reevaluation of the state’s child support obligations and a more nuanced understanding of the parent-child relationship and financial dynamics. Addressing these critiques is essential for fostering a more responsive and equitable child support framework in New Hampshire.

Recent Developments and Future Directions

In recent years, New Hampshire’s child support model has seen significant scrutiny and debate, particularly in light of the state’s transition from the Percentage-of-Income model to the Income Shares model. This shift aims to align the child support obligations more closely with the child’s actual needs as well as the parents’ financial capabilities, making the process more equitable. Legislative movements in recent months indicate a growing interest in further refining these guidelines to better adapt to changing economic realities and social dynamics. As families undergo various transformations, whether through divorce or co-parenting arrangements, the child support system must evolve to meet these needs effectively.

Public opinion surveys conducted throughout the state reveal a general sentiment among constituents favoring child support formulas that prioritize child welfare while maintaining fairness for both parents. These sentiments are influencing lawmakers, with many advocating for periodic reviews of child support calculations to ensure that they remain relevant and reflective of current socio-economic conditions. As the legislature considers adjustments, there is a strong push towards policies that may enhance transparency and simplicity in the application of child support laws.

The future directions of New Hampshire’s child support model will likely include an evaluation of how both models—Income Shares and Percentage-of-Income—can coexist or be integrated to serve families optimally. Ongoing studies and stakeholder consultations could lead to innovative reforms aimed at addressing disparities in payments and ensuring that both parents contribute fairly to the upbringing of their children. As these developments unfold, it remains crucial that any changes consider the complexities of modern family structures and the best interests of children at the forefront of policy discussions. Stakeholders across the board will need to participate actively in these discussions to shape the future landscape of child support.

Conclusion

In this analysis of New Hampshire’s child support model, we have explored the distinct approaches of Income Shares and Percentage-of-Income. Understanding these models is critical for parents and legal practitioners alike, as they directly impact family dynamics and the welfare of children. New Hampshire adopts the Income Shares model, which considers the combined income of both parents to estimate the financial support necessary for a child’s upbringing. This approach emphasizes shared responsibility and attempts to replicate the level of financial support that children would have received if their parents were living together.

Conversely, the Percentage-of-Income model uses a fixed percentage of a parent’s income to determine child support payments. While this model can simplify calculations, it may not account for variations in actual expenses related to raising a child. Each model presents its own advantages and potential challenges, thereby contributing to differing outcomes for families navigating child support obligations.

Recognizing the implications of these child support models is essential for ensuring that children receive adequate financial resources. As families face various circumstances, understanding the nuances of New Hampshire’s implementation of the Income Shares model provides insights into the balancing act of meeting children’s needs while considering parental financial situations. Ultimately, both parents have a critical role in fostering a nurturing environment, and comprehending these child support frameworks can help facilitate informed decisions for their family’s future. Engaging with a knowledgeable attorney can further clarify options and consequences, ensuring that the welfare of children remains at the forefront of all considerations.

Email This Share on X Share on LinkedIn
Citations
Embed This Article

Copy and paste this <iframe> into your site. It renders a lightweight card.

Preview loads from ?cta_embed=1 on this post.

NEW

Smart Legal Starts Here

✓Free walkthroughs for your legal situations
✓Track your legal request in your free dashboard
✓Draft and review your docs free
✓Only pay when you want action
+ Post a Legal Service Request

Smart Legal Starts Here

✓Free walkthroughs for your legal situations
✓Track your legal request in your free dashboard
✓Draft and review your docs free
✓Only pay when you want action
+ Post a Legal Service Request

Related Posts

  • Understanding Alaska’s Child Support Model: Income Shares vs. Percentage-of-Income
  • Understanding Arkansas Child Support: Income Shares vs. Percentage-of-Income Model
  • Understanding California’s Child Support Model: Income Shares vs. Percentage-of-Income
  • Understanding Connecticut’s Child Support Calculation: Income Shares vs. Percentage-of-Income Model
  • Understanding Florida’s Child Support Model: Income Shares vs. Percentage-of-Income
  • Understanding Georgia’s Child Support Model: Income Shares vs. Percentage-of-Income
  • Understanding Indiana’s Child Support Calculation: Income Shares vs. Percentage-of-Income Model
  • Understanding Louisiana’s Child Support Model: Income Shares vs. Percentage-of-Income
  • Understanding Michigan’s Child Support Model: Income Shares vs. Percentage-of-Income
  • Understanding Nebraska’s Child Support Model: Income Shares vs. Percentage-of-Income
  • A Step-by-Step Guide to Starting a Business in Andorra
  • Navigating Andorra’s Tax Haven Status: Optimizing Business and Wealth
  • The Importance of Intellectual Property Rights in Andorra
  • A Guide to Andorra’s Corporate Law: Key Considerations for Foreign Investors
  • Key Considerations for Businesses Operating in Andorra: Employment Regulations
  • A Guide to Real Estate Acquisition in Andorra: Legal Procedures and Pitfalls to Avoid
  • A Comprehensive Guide to Setting up a Financial Services Company in Andorra
  • The Impact of Andorra’s EU Agreements on Local Businesses
  • Strengthening Anti-Money Laundering Measures in Andorra: Combating Financial Crime and Terrorism Financing
  • Andorra’s Commitment to Compliance and Anti-Money Laundering Measures
  • The Law Behind Accessibility
  • The Law Behind Accessibility
  • The Law Behind Accessibility
  • The Law Behind Accessibility
  • The Law Behind Accessibility
  • Refund Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • AI Agent Policy
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • RSS
© 2025 Generis Global Legal Services. All rights reserved.

Quick Apply

Application submitted

Thanks for applying! Our team will review your application and get back to you within 15 days. If you don’t hear from the HR team within that time, your application may not have been successful.