646 666 9601 [email protected]

If a contract exists with a dissolved corporation, the deal will remain legally binding.

 Contracting With a Dissolved Company

If a contract exists with a dissolved corporation, the deal will remain legally binding. The only exception to this rule is if you incorporated a lease termination provision into your contract that explicitly addresses your company’s closure. Dissolving a corporation does not cancel any leases the corporation has, including those for real estate, business cars, or other creditors.

Contract Terms for Dissolved Businesses

There may be penalties if the contract does not contain terms relating to invoking an early termination option. In certain situations, the contracts will contain provisions outlining the anticipated penalties and fines for early termination. Penalties and fines are implemented in real estate to compensate for the time and expenditure required to locate a new renter for the property. While the fines and costs may be considerable, in certain cases they will be less than the cost of completing the contract.

If the lease does not contain a penalties and fees provision, or if you fail to pay the penalties and fees mentioned in the contract, legal action may be taken to ensure that the remaining lease is paid. The contract legally binds you to comply with the lease conditions, and courts are more likely to side with the lessor even if you no longer use the property for business reasons.

If you are unable to pay the lease requirements that you are required to pay, a business bankruptcy may be considered. The kind of bankruptcy filed will be determined by the nature of the company. Businesses that are shutting are confined to Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which will wipe off the bulk of the company’s obligations. Normally, farms or fisheries would seek Chapter 12 bankruptcy protection.

Lawsuits and Company Dissolution

An LLC, or Limited Liability Company, is a legal corporate entity distinct from its owners, who are referred to as members. This protects the members’ personal liabilities in the same manner that corporations do. The articles of organisation must be submitted with the state business registrar at the time of incorporation. To officially dissolve the company, the articles of dissolution must be submitted at the moment of dissolution.

The capacity to sue a dissolved company will be determined by a number of issues, including:

The LLC was constituted under the laws of the state in which it was founded.

If the corporation followed the required dissolution processes.

The amount of time that has elapsed from the moment of dissolution.

If the LLC has stopped operations but has not been properly dissolved, it might be sued until the legal formalities are followed. LLCs must abide by the laws of the governing state, which vary by state. The regulations for suing dissolved LLCs are likewise included in the state legislation. A lawyer is advised if a case is brought against a dissolved LLC due to the shifting factors.

If the LLC follows the correct processes and the business is legally dissolved, the time permitted to initiate a lawsuit is limited and will ultimately expire. This duration is three years in many states. The LLC is regarded cancelled at that moment, and no litigation may be brought. In certain places, the timeline for filing a lawsuit coincides with the necessity for public notice. The public notice must be published in a newspaper and must contain the following information:

A statement stating that the firm is going out of business.

The closure date.

An address where you may register a claim.

If applicable, the deadline for filing a lawsuit.

Depending on the state, the notice may need to be published more than once.

Other impediments that may arise if a claim is brought within the allowed term include:

There is a limit on how much money may be received in a judgement.

Only being able to collect from assets that have not been dispersed or assets obtained by members after liquidation.

If the LLC members have committed a wrongdoing, an effort to release the members from culpability is feasible. Piercing the corporate veil is only permitted in extremely few circumstances, such as fraud. If the member is successful, the member’s personal assets may be confiscated to satisfy the judgement.