Managed document review refers to the process of reviewing and analyzing large volumes of documents, typically in the context of legal or regulatory matters, with the help of specialized software and teams of trained reviewers. Here are some of the pros and cons of managed document review:

Table of Contents

Pros:

Cost-Efficiency:

Managed document review can be more cost-effective than traditional manual review processes. Utilizing technology and specialized teams can reduce the time and resources required for the review, leading to potential cost savings.

Start my Document Review

Speed and Efficiency:

Advanced document review tools and processes can significantly expedite the review process. Machine learning algorithms can prioritize relevant documents, helping legal teams focus on critical information faster.

Accuracy and Consistency:

When conducted by experienced reviewers and supported by technology, managed document review can result in higher accuracy and consistency compared to manual reviews. This reduces the risk of missing important information or making errors.

Scalability:

Managed document review can easily scale to handle large document populations, making it suitable for complex litigation or investigations involving vast amounts of data.

Expertise and Training:

Managed review providers often have access to skilled professionals who are experienced in document review and trained to identify relevant information effectively.

Security and Confidentiality:

Reputable managed review providers implement robust security measures to protect sensitive information and maintain confidentiality throughout the review process.

Cons:

Initial Setup and Learning Curve:

Implementing managed document review requires setting up appropriate software, training reviewers, and integrating the process with existing workflows, which can be time-consuming.

Technological Limitations:

Although technology has significantly improved document review, no solution is perfect. Machine learning algorithms might have difficulty understanding nuances in language or context, leading to false positives or false negatives.

Over-Reliance on Technology:

Relying too heavily on technology without proper human oversight could result in the unintentional exclusion of crucial documents or the disclosure of privileged information.

Communication Challenges:

In some cases, there might be challenges in communication between the legal team and the managed review provider, which could lead to misunderstandings or inefficiencies.

Cost Variability:

While managed document review can be cost-effective, the actual expenses may vary depending on the complexity of the project, the number of documents, and the pricing model used by the service provider.

Limited Strategic Insight:

Managed review is primarily focused on identifying relevant documents. It may not provide deeper strategic insights that experienced attorneys could offer during a manual review.

In conclusion, managed document review offers several advantages, particularly in terms of cost, speed, and accuracy. However, it’s essential to consider the potential limitations and ensure that a balanced approach is taken to leverage both technology and human expertise effectively.